Non-Payment and Extending Credit: Ten Considerations

Non-Payment and Extending Credit: Ten Considerations for Contractors and Suppliers

Your company is not a bank. You are not in the business of lending money over extended periods of time.

Just because the general contractor has not been paid does not mean that you should not be paid (see item #1).

Remember that you have other remedies besides a construction lien. Delivering a written notice of lien can be an effective way to stop the flow of funds on a project. Likewise, a breach of trust claim can be a powerful tool.

Agree upon credit terms in advance. Be consistent, clear and concise. Obtain information about your customer by way of a credit application, including the correct legal name of the business, and current banking information.

Do the Due! Conduct appropriate due diligence including: (a) credit searches; (b) reference checks; (c) property and corporate searches; (d) writ searches.

Identify problems early. Warning signs to watch for include: (a) slow or non-payment; (b) N.S.F. cheques or post-dated cheques; (c) cheques coming from someone other than the customer; (d) re-structuring or presence of outside people such as an accountant or “consultant”.

Get something in return. In exchange for revised credit terms, seek an acknowledgement and agreement on the amount of the outstanding debt, or additional security if necessary.

Lawsuits are inevitable. Good procedures and record keeping reduce the cost of lawsuits and increase the likelihood of recovery in collections. Consider whether your company has a clear mechanism for acknowledgement of receipt or pick-up of product.

Know when to cut your losses. $100 today is worth more than the possibility of $125 two years from now. Don’t be afraid to cut deals!

As hard as it is to believe, general contractors and customers do occasionally lie about the cheque having been mailed out!

Frequently Asked Questions

Should you buy a business as an asset purchase?

I am negotiating to purchase a business and my business advisor has strongly suggested I structure the deal as an “asset purchase”. Why is this preferable?

‍There are two principal ways to structure the agreement of purchase and sale of a business: as an asset purchase or as a share purchase. An asset purchase is just that, a purchase of listed assets without taking on liabilities of the business. A share purchase, by contrast, is the purchase of the shares of the corporation that carries on the business and owns the assets. There are a number of considerations as to which form of purchase is preferable. In this article, we want to focus on why your advisor has strongly recommended an asset purchase.

‍Liability

‍A properly structured asset purchase agreement will allow you to purchase all of the desirable assets of the business you wish to acquire while leaving out the unwanted liabilities.

Your advisor has likely identified the business as one either by its nature or by the disclosure you’ve obtained in which there are significant potential liabilities that may be avoided through an asset purchase agreement. For example, if the owner of the business has been pocketing cash payments or using corporate assets for personal use, the business may be exposed to re-assessments and penalties by the Canada Revenue Agency. A purchase of shares would mean that you, through the purchased corporation, are exposed to those claims.

‍Exceptions

‍There are some exceptions to the avoidance of liability by an asset purchase. For instance, if the purchased business employed unionized labour, a collective agreement and any ongoing liabilities thereunder will follow the purchased business, even if structured as an asset purchase. Your legal counsel can assist you to identify and understand the relevant risks and how to avoid them where possible or otherwise obtain protection.

How do partnerships work and how are they setup?

My friend and I have an idea for a business and we are considering forming a partnership. How does a partnership work and how should one be setup?

Whether or not a partnership exists is a fundamentally a legal question. Ontario’s Partnerships Act says that a relationship between “persons carrying on a business in common with a view to profit” is a partnership within the meaning of the Act. This is important because it means that whether or not you declare yourself to be a partnership, legally speaking, you might be a partnership anyways, whether you intended to or not.

A partnership can exist between you and your friend personally, or even as between two corporations controlled by each of you. Unlike a corporation, however, a partnership has no separate legal existence from the partners themselves and each partner has the power to bind the partnership and each partner is jointly liable for any obligations incurred on behalf of the firm. This is why, when deciding to form a partnership, a partnership agreement can be very practical.

A partnership agreement sets out the rights and obligations for partners in the partnership and provides for what should happen in circumstances of partnership incapacity, retirement or death. Without one, the Partnerships Act will provide for what happens to the partnership in these circumstances, often with unintended results. A partnership agreement can also provide mechanisms for the distribution of partnership income and a process for bringing additional persons into the partnership. Creating a partnership agreement that meets your goals with the help of a commercial Lawyer ensures that your partnership will continue in a manner of your design.

Acquisition of a Business - Do such contracts affect the decision to acquire shares or assets?

I am considering the acquisition of a business. Long term contracts between the business and third parties are important to the business. Do such contracts affect the decision to acquire shares or assets of the business?

‍There are a number of factors to be taken into account when purchasing an existing business including tax, liability, due diligence and employee matters. Your question relates to the contracts between the business and third parties. These contracts may include rights obtained by the business necessary to carry on the business, such as licenses or franchises, or the benefit of sale or service agreements for the supply of products or services that generate revenue for the business.

A fundamental difference between an asset purchase and a share purchase is that in an asset sale the contracts must be assigned (along with the transfer of assets) while in a share sale the contracts remain intact (since only the shares of the business itself are transferred).A comprehensive review of all important contracts is advisable as early as possible during the due diligence process to determine rights and obligations. If third party consents are required, consideration must be given as to the risk that such consents may not be available in a timely manner, or at all, and whether the transaction may be better structured to avoid the necessity for assignment. In some less common circumstances there is an outright bar to assignment and consents cannot be obtained (this is the case in some government procurements). The acquisition of the business in such circumstances may only be achieved through a share sale to avoid termination of such contract(s). It should also be noted that some contracts contain provisions that deem a change of control from a sale of shares to be equivalent to assignment, and triggering the necessity for third party consent.