Joint Ownership as a Way of Estate Planning.

Kanata CA personal injury, family, and real estate law firm

One of the goals of proper estate planning is to minimize tax consequences and other costs of transferring property to a spouse or to the next generation, another is to make the transfer as smooth as possible. Holding property in joint ownership might be a good way to achieve such goals in certain circumstances.

Common law allows two or more people to own property in joint ownership, meaning they all have equal ownership of the property and same rights when it comes to dealing with the property. Joint ownership is very significant for estate planning purposes because it generally creates a right of survivorship, meaning that the ownership of the property is automatically transferred to the surviving owner without becoming a part of the deceased’s estate. Very often, holding majority of one’s property in joint ownership disposes with the need for probate. In the instances when probate is required, the jointly held property is generally not included in the probate and therefore the probate fees are lower than it would be if such property was included in probate. Joint ownership also makes a formal process of transferring property to the surviving joint owner easier and less cumbersome when dealing with various institutions, such as banks and the land registry office.  For example having a joint bank account makes it lot easier for the surviving joint owner to pay the funeral expenses and all other immediate costs associated with someone’s death or it might allow the joint owner to sell the jointly owned house without waiting for the probate.

However, not all jointly owned property passes to the surviving co-owner.

It is important to know that the courts, over the decades, have limited the right of survivorship to certain situations and that in many instances, the surviving joint owner must prove that the deceased co-owner intended for the property to pass to him or her by way of survivorship. The courts have categorized a joint ownership into two groups. One group is the joint ownership of property by spouses or by a parent and a minor child. In those circumstances there is a presumption that the property was intended to pass by way of survivorship. The second group is the joint ownership involving all other people, whether related or not. In such situations there is a presumption that the joint property was held in trust for the joint owner who transferred the assets into joint-ownership and the surviving joint owner must show that the deceased intended to give the property to the surviving joint owner. The courts acknowledge that often a joint ownership is created as a convenient way to deal with property, such as adult child having a joint account with an elderly parent in order for an adult child to help with banking or two friends having sharing a condo in Florida and having a joint US account to pay the bills associated with the condo. In those circumstances, there is a presumption that the non-contributing joint owner holds the property in trust for the contributing joint owner or if both contribute to the account, that they each hold in trust the portion that the other joint owner contributed.

Joint ownership for estate planning purposes is therefore very common between spouses, where they intend to pass all or most of their property to each other at the time of death or in a situation where there is only one parent and one adult child, who is also the only beneficiary under the will. But there are also circumstances where even in those situations joint ownership might not be appropriate. For example, if one of the spouses is a business owner and is exposed to potential liability from creditors or exposed to potential professional liability. The property that is jointly owned is exposed to such liability. Any benefit of potential savings on probate fees might out-weight the risk of loosing the property to the creditors.  Further, holding a property in joint ownership with an adult child that has a spouse exposes such property to a potential spousal claim in the event of a relationship break-down.  Another issue of holding a property in joint ownership is the ability to having full control over the property or being able to sell the property in case of disagreement between joint owners. This is particularly seen in the case when two unmarried persons decide to buy a property as joint owners and subsequently there is a relationship breakdown. In the expressed situations it is advisable that there is an agreement in place at the time of acquiring of property explaining what should happen in case of relationship breakdown.

Joint ownership is certainly an efficient way of succession planning. However, due to its pitfalls, it is always advisable to discuss those issues  with an experienced wills and estate lawyer.